Revised version of IHRA plenary in Bucharest working definition of antisemitism
Anti-judaism describes a range of ideologies in which the Sinai covenant is abrogated, while a subset of the promises and prophecies of the Hebrew bible are appropriated into an alternate and incompatible religion or ideology that is held to supercede or replace the covenant Jewish people as “light to the nations”, and a day other than the seventh is usually held to be the Sabbath and sign of the covenant. The eschatalogical expectation is for Jews to convert, assimilate, disappear from the stage of history, or to remain marginalized and powerless. Unbelief and evil is subsequently typed in Jewish terms, so that anti-Judaism may be expressed as hatred and dehumanization of Jews, hatred toward gentiles accused of unbelief, worldliness, materialism, or other characteristically “Jewish” flaws. It can also be expressed as love toward Jews as mere humans, often made in efforts to convert them away from Judaism or to deny that Judaism even remains in existence as system of faith that is worthy of belief and practice.
Anti-Jewish belief systems have included Nicean christianity, Islam, Enlightenment rationalism, Kantian and Hegelian idealism, Marxist historic materialism, and others. Most contemporary expressions of anti-zionism have their basis in anti-Jewish ideologies, as does secular zionism itself, and reform Judaism before it. Reform Judaism and secular zionism were both coping mechanisms by which Jews cut themselves off from the covenant and reduced themselves to the status of mere Semites, often in order cope with the phenomenon of Jews being hated and typed as evil.
“Antisemitism is a racial essentialist perception of traditional and religious anti-judaism, which treats even assimilated Jews and those who’ve converted to atheism or to other religions, as incorrigibly Jewish and therefore evil. The term was coined in the 1880's to make anti-Judaism seem “scientifically respectable”.
Semitism is not Judaism
Moreover,
- the UN Declaration of Human rights does not replace the holy Torah
- the United Nations and the Ivy League do not replace God
- arts and culture and cooking do not replace Jewish prayer and worship
- the Democratic party platform does not replace the Sinai covenant, and
- exclusive fixation on 6 million dead Jews in Germany does not promote Jewish futures or honor the memory of so many others in 1,900 years of Jewish history in exile.
But by making and publicly insisting on all these false replacement theories, and by allowing anti-semites themselves to define the terms of debate, holocaust museums are miseducating the general public, squandering an opportunity to make allies and friends, abdicated their priestly role to share “light to the nations” by teaching them the Noahide covenant, failing to refute the false premises of racist anti-semitism, and actively promoting or enabling anti-Judaism. Moreover, America does not replace Canaan as the promised land, and Israel is not a colony of the American democratic party. It should not be pressured to function as such, and holocaust museums have neglected to study the anti-Judaism implicit in christian dominionism and settler colonialism of the Americas.
See also: antisemitism and antiJudaism - legacies of imperial christianity. (Nirenberg, 2014)
Consistent with this declaration, and with the vital critique of Dara Horn, “People Love Dead Jews”, and the analysis the analysis of Anti-Judaism: The Western Tradition by Nirenberg, David W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-34791-5 (2014)
we propose these rewrites.
The signatories of all these documents are failing to come to terms with each other or with their opposition - the anti-semites themselves. Equivocation is inevitable when you let the anti-semites define the terms, and these competing definitions are worse than a red herring: they stipulate with the anti-semites that Judaism has been replaced. We call on all the signatories to either repent and return to Torah Judaism, or else assimilate to mainstream culture, consider themselves mere semites, “cut off from the covenant”, and cease their efforts at redefining Judaism according to their crafty rationalizations in order to satisfy their wandering desires and ignore their prophets. They are promoting anti-semitism, by choosing to deny the covenant and promote enlightenment rationalism in a manner that many find contemptible. If they are held in contempt, they ought to start by blaming but themselves, and choosing to repent.